College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

White privilege mars debate

Guest commentary

Published: Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 02:10

Ben Eckstein’s recent commentary is a really great example of white privilege.

Eckstein argues in his commentary that he is American, but he is also “Native American,” and because he is Native American and white he understands the issue and controversy of Columbus Day.

One issue is that Columbus Day should be celebrated because of the spirit of discovery and the history of the journey. The other issue is that Columbus Day should be a day of mourning as well and to honor what “they left behind” because obviously all indigenous people are all dead and don’t exist anymore.

Let me tell you why Eckstein’s commentary is flawed and illogical. First, he is making the wrong assumption of why people like Carina Miller and myself protest Columbus Day. The issue is about having an Indigenous Solidarity Day, not just giving you a one-way ticket, although if Eckstein does want a one-way domestic ticket, may I suggest going to a reservation.

Second, he assumes and makes the issue of injustice towards “American Indians” as a thing of the past, when in reality or should I say in de facto, even de jure the indigenous peoples are one of the most oppressed and underrepresented communities in the United States to this day.

Now, let me tell you why Eckstein’s comments make him seem like an ignorant white man and why his commentary is a great example of white privilege.

Eckstein makes the issue about himself and blames the victim for supposedly not understanding his white history. Eckstein says that those who see Christopher Columbus as a “terrorist” are unreasonable, because they don’t see what the status quo sees. When you don’t have to know anyone else’s truth but your own, then it’s what many scholars like to call white privilege. It’s also very white privilege of Eckstein to expect everyone else to know his white history.

The audacity of a white man calling himself a Native American is sickening. Just because Eckstein was born in this country doesn’t mean that he is Native American. Eckstein will never be a Native American because he does not belong to that community.

Just as a side note, what is with some white folks who assume that they know the experiences and struggles of people of color, it just boggles my mind.

Eckstein argues that his ancestor’s only crime was in the “uninvited taking of that betterment,” but I disagree. The de facto of the situation is that Ben’s ancestors were allowed to own other people, to receive free property, to pass down wealth from generation to generation, to vote, to have an education, to purchase homes when people of color weren’t allowed to, and I can keep going but hopefully I made my point. Being white is having the ability to deny and hide your history.

opinion@dailyemerald.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

10 comments

Betz
Wed Oct 21 2009 12:57
"When you don’t have to know anyone else’s truth but your own, then it’s what many scholars like to call white privilege."

I would probably call it 'pulling a Diego Hernandez' ...

Your name
Wed Oct 21 2009 02:44
diego has always been a source of embarrassment wherever he goes.
M
Tue Oct 20 2009 21:50
Diego, is it fair to assume that 'colored' people can't understand the 'experiences and struggles' of white people? Simply because of my skin color you're assuming I can't fathom the difficulties you have faced in your life? What short sighted nonsense. You are just as bad as any Klansman or segregationist.
Natasha
Tue Oct 20 2009 21:41
Good points! Although your anger is obvious there is a good reason for it. More power to you.
ThisRageTastesLikeChicken
Tue Oct 20 2009 21:32
Oh, give Diego a break.

The word "logic", after all, comes from the Greek word "logike." As we all know, Greeks are "white people". Expecting him, therefore, to know or care about ideas like "logic" that were cooked up by dead white men is, I'm sure he'd agree, racist in the extreme and yet another example of white privilege.

Shame on all of you.

WhiteAmerican
Tue Oct 20 2009 17:24
Doooooooooooooooooooooshbaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaag
Betz
Tue Oct 20 2009 16:51
There is only one place where this piece of print belongs - the trash.

"The audacity of a white man calling himself a Native American is sickening. Just because Eckstein was born in this country doesn’t mean that he is Native American. Eckstein will never be a Native American because he does not belong to that community."

Read the two columns side by side again: Ben makes the point that he was born in this country, and is "a native American just as much as anybody else born in this land." Note that the phrase 'native American', used in this context, simply means someone who was born and is from America or the United States - not capital-N 'Native American', which Diego interprets. I would be wrong to say that I believe that this was just a misunderstanding over a typo...

"The other issue is that Columbus Day should be a day of mourning as well and to honor what “they left behind” because obviously all indigenous people are all dead and don’t exist anymore."

This is Hernandez' own spin on things, and willful ignorance of the text ... nowhere in Ben's article did he mention that all Native Americans no longer exist or are 'dead'.

"The issue is about having an Indigenous Solidarity Day..."

Call it whatever you want to call it ... just don't send native Americans (not the use of the lowercase-'n') tickets to "go back home" ... this was, after all, what I think prompted Ben's letter in the first place ...

"Eckstein says that those who see Christopher Columbus as a “terrorist” are unreasonable, because they don’t see what the status quo sees. When you don’t have to know anyone else’s truth but your own, then it’s what many scholars like to call white privilege. It’s also very white privilege of Eckstein to expect everyone else to know his white history."

This is the very core of Diego's argument, and it sickens me to have to read this garbage. Ben's article made the case that there are obviously two sides of the coin - Christopher Columbus: Spanish explorer who "discovered" America, or international terrorist? These are the extremes of the spectrum - I would like to think that most people are somewhere in the middle already, but for those that aren't, exposing yourself to a new perspective might make us all come to some agreement of better understanding of one another.

Thats all it is - a matter of a new perspective. But Hernandez rejects this, instead claiming that those that view Christopher Columbus as a terrorist don't have to see a new perspective on the issue because that other perspective is a "white" perspective.

"When you don’t have to know anyone else’s truth but your own, then it’s what many scholars like to call white privilege."

Funny ... the beginning clause of that sentence didn't mention anything about being white at all. It's almost as if Hernandez thinks that only white people can be ignorant and bigoted. (*HINT*). No single race has a monopoly on ignorance, Hernandez.

"...I can keep going but hopefully I made my point."

I sincerely doubt you have convinced anybody that you have made anything remotely close to a point in this waste of ink.

Diversity is about the embracing of other cultures and listening to opinions and ideas different from your own. Ben's article is one that fosters diversity and strengthens cultural bonding between the Native American community and the rest of society.

Hernandez' backlash, however, accomplishes exactly the opposite - instead of listening to other opinions, Hernandez' is censoring his critics by "white"-washing them.This isn't diversity, and it is frankly shameful that this kind of voice and dialog is given representation by the MCC. If I were director of the MCC, I would take a step back and issue a statement that "these are the opinions of the author alone, not representative of the MCC", blah blah blah.

We could all stand to learn and understand a lot about one another's identity and the groups that they identify with - but not when crap like this is shouting over the voices of diversity that are trying to create the binds that make that kind of understanding possible.

Heh.
Tue Oct 20 2009 16:06
Diego Hernandez is a racist. Once you realize that, everything he says makes a lot more sense.
Noe Lozano
Tue Oct 20 2009 15:31
Diego, si la Universidad te deja graduar, tendré que pedirle a Phil Knight que regale $100 millones al colegio de Arts and Sciences para dar fin a la educacion tan horrible que has recibido.
Mike
Tue Oct 20 2009 11:52
Do you actually attend U of O? If so the standard of education must be low if you consider this a reasoned argument.






log out