College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Report links Masoli, Embry to fraternity theft

MacBooks among the stolen items; Masoli, Embry aren’t current suspects, EPD says

Published: Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, January 26, 2010

A theft allegedly involving two football players occurred early Sunday morning at the Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity near the University campus, according to the Eugene Police Department and a member of the fraternity.

EPD spokesperson Melinda Kletzok said police responded to the reported theft at 12:48 a.m. on Sunday at the fraternity house, located at 812 E. 14th Ave.

Kletzok said the items stolen included two MacBooks, valued at $2,000 and $1,500 each, and a “valuable” guitar. Kletzok could not release any more information citing an open investigation, and she said she expects an officer to be assigned to the case today.

Kletzok said Masoli and Embry have not been named suspects and there are no persons of interest in the case.

The Emerald received two voicemail messages from a phone belonging to University sophomore and SAE member Wayne Kohnke early Sunday morning just after the incident occurred.

“Hello,” one of the messages said. “Wake up. It’s the story of a lifetime. Jeremiah Masoli and Garrett Embry just stole all my friend’s possessions ... We need a story run on this. Do you understand?”

Media outlets began reporting Sunday night that a member of the fraternity identified the alleged thieves as quarterback Jeremiah Masoli and wide receiver Garrett Embry of the University football team.

The fraternity declined comment when reached by phone Monday.

“Our stance right now is we’re not going to comment on the situation,” a member of SAE said. The fraternity member would not disclose his name.

However, fraternity member and University biology student Max Wolfard, who reported the incident to police, spoke to The Oregonian early Sunday evening.

Wolfard told The Oregonian that he had noticed the star quarterback and wide receiver acting suspicious and that they appeared to be hiding something. He then noticed that one of the players, who he identified as Embry, was carrying his projector screen. Wolfard said the players then ran out of the fraternity in different directions, and Wolfard proceeded to chase after Embry.

After a few blocks, Wolfard said Embry stopped and gave him back his projector, saying, “You’ve got it back, now you better get out of here.”

When Wolfard returned to the fraternity house, he said he discovered his MacBook laptop and guitar were missing. Fellow fraternity member Max Iantorno said his door was open and his MacBook was also missing.

Wolfard told The Oregonian that he was positive he had correctly identified the players.

University athletic department spokesperson Dave Williford called the student’s accusation against the two players “unsubstantiated” and said he would not comment further until EPD knew more.

“We’ve received no updates from yesterday, and at this point, it’s our position that it’s yet to be substantiated that it’s a student-athlete involved in this incident,” Williford said. “Until that’s substantiated, don’t anticipate further comment.”

Williford also said he would not comment on the athletes’ potential athletic punishments should the accusations prove true.

“That’s trying to create something that you don’t know is there,” Williford said, adding. “Each incident with a different athlete is treated differently.”

Williford said he was also unsure what the potential academic punishments may be.

News editor Jill Kimball contributed to this report 

jmarx@dailyemerald.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

60 comments

Anonymous
Wed Feb 24 2010 16:09
Jesus was supposed to be born at UO, but they couldn't find a virgin or three wise men. They did find a manger though, and it was full of Duck alumni.
Anonymous
Wed Feb 24 2010 16:07
How do you keep Oregon football players out of your end zone? You don't have to, they're already all in jail!
Anonymous
Sun Feb 21 2010 20:19
Gees, cut the PC bullcrap. If some guy named Hans ran off with my laptop, I'd be inclined to refer to him as a "f******
kraut."
Anonymous
Sat Feb 6 2010 19:07
Mr Awesome you sound like a complete id!ot. How did you get into this school?
Mr.Awsome
Wed Feb 3 2010 08:01
And again I say if the SAE kid Max Wolfard was able to was able to run Receiver Garrett Embry then shouldn't U of 0 try & recruit him for next season...
And as far as Garrett Embry carring a digital projector & wearing street clothes that shouldn't even matter...
Digital projectors are not heavy... so that is not an excuse
U of O should recruit him if he is really fast enough to run down Garret Embry...
anonymous
Sat Jan 30 2010 20:12
ok garret embry is probably faster than the kid who ran him down, but he was carrying a projector, was in his street clothes and obviously gave up because he turned around and gave the projector back as opposed to the sae kid having to tackle him,
Anonymous
Fri Jan 29 2010 19:23
Could this be the JUMP FROM CHAMP TO CHUMP?
weak article
Fri Jan 29 2010 11:20
The Emerald really shouldn't have run Wayne's name. He's probably going to get jumped or threatened, and is definitely going to be getting a lot of criticism about this. It's a bad situation all around, and everyone should just wait for a police report before poor journalism like this is reported that slanders multiple people and a fraternity.
Rodney
Thu Jan 28 2010 23:30
I don't know much about finger prints, but i'd say that in a frat house there's enough finger prints on everything to be able to convict the entire UO campus.
Think Again
Thu Jan 28 2010 23:07
Think Again.... I have it on very very good authority that these football players are 100% responsible... You just don't make up a story like this.... If you saw Tiger Woods standing next to you, would you notice? Of course, and so do these kids, when they are staring down their idol, the quarterback of the UO football team...What are the police waiting for? They already have finger prints! Sorry Masoli/Embry!
Max Wolfard
Thu Jan 28 2010 16:56
Sorry guys, found my laptop and valuable guitar..they were under my bed. I just remembered, when I saw Masoli acting suspicious in a suspicious way, I got a bit suspicious and hid them from him. Silly me.
Common Sense
Thu Jan 28 2010 16:23
@slam3433- I agree with you- he has a scholarship and anything he wants... there is not reason he would need to steal anything

Masoli will be in the league in less than two years and that is the only reason the paper ran this story...

If the frat tards had accused anyone else it wouldn't have published but because the author thought he could use Masoli's name to make a name for himself and "break the story" it seems rushed and inaccurately portrayed. Its bad to make an accusation seem true when it hasn't been confirmed. Bad bad bad.

Semantics
Thu Jan 28 2010 00:48
I'm a little confused by the racist accusations. I have always interpreted the term "hood rat" as being a derogatory accusation based on someone's economic class, not race.
MR.Awsome
Wed Jan 27 2010 20:44
??? O.K. This might be off the subject a little bit but If frat kid Max Wolfard was able to
chase down Receiver Garrett Embry then shouldn't U of 0 try & recruit him for next season ???
ksig
Wed Jan 27 2010 19:47
SAE was closed 15 years ago after having a drug problem and their president being found guilty of raping a young woman in the cemetery . I agree with the comment earlier. The projector should have finger prints on it. Who uses hoodrats? Racist do. Your in a fraternity, lock your doors. Don't the doors have door codes. Its not summer. Its cold, so the windows are all closed. Is there a two people in the house. I remember being in fraternities at 1am after a saturday night. They should be going off. Girls around, plus that whole area is busy around the Sae house. Story sounds strange.
Bobby Love
Wed Jan 27 2010 00:11
I wasn't commenting on the issue of journalistic ethics. I am in agreement with you, the paper probably should have substantiated the caller's claims. I was simply commenting on the laws regarding slander, libel and false light.

The ownness of liability ultimately falls on the caller. However, articles of this caliber should be triangulated to make sure the story is true. The reporter in this case is protecting against being scooped by a larger, more widely read paper.

----
Tue Jan 26 2010 22:24
@bobbylove
"Also, slander is not a crime, it's a tortious act." Perhaps illegal is too harsh a word but they can seek punitive damages.
"The paper had every reason the believe the veracity of the callers story, so no - this arcicle should not be removed from anywhere." -I know that if I received a more than sketchy phone call in the middle of the night that was not corroborated by the eugene police department I would wait to confirm it before posting it risking the reputation of two public figures at the University of Oregon. However my moral compass lays elsewhere and freedom of the press should be celebrated not suppressed---that's my bad.

Name calling is a little uncalled for, yet I appreciate your attempt to expand my vocabulary.

--- Cheers

Bobby Love
Tue Jan 26 2010 21:20
@DELETE THIS ARTICLE:

It's not slanderous stupid. Slander in a written form is called libel, but this isn't libel either. For your statement to be substantiated, the paper would have to publish statements they knew to be false that caused its victim measurable damage or harmed their reputation in their community or the public.

In a case like this, the slanderous behavior is what was committed if the caller knew his statements were false. That may prove liability, but damages may not be assessed if the victim cannot prove any. Also, slander is not a crime, it's a tortious act.

Long story short, you're a platitudinous idiot who should not bring up legal issues that you know nothing about. The paper had every reason the believe the veracity of the callers story, so no - this arcicle should not be removed from anywhere.

Observer
Tue Jan 26 2010 20:17
Perhaps this has been pointed out below, but how fast can this SAE kid run? He's supposedly giving chase to NCAA players who make their scholarship money running a ball down a field? That sounds plausible.
Your name
Tue Jan 26 2010 19:41
If I called the daily emerald and said that Wayne Kohnke stole from me and called me a n***** would this be reported? Do you need factual evidence to post articles or do you just post willy nilly?






log out