College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Pacifica protest

Self-proclaimed free speech group incites student protest, Kallaway demands Forum to leave EMU

Published: Monday, January 11, 2010

Updated: Monday, January 11, 2010

Laughter, yells and emotional sobs emanated from the entrance of the EMU Walnut Room, rimmed with campus safety officers, at the Jan. 8 meeting of the Pacifica Forum, titled, “Everything You Wanted to Know about Pacifica Forum but were Afraid to Ask.”

The scene was tense.

Student and community protesters lined the walls with signs reading, “Free Speech is not Hate Speech,” surrounding a seated group of Forum supporters all appearing to be older than 40, while curious observers with shocked expressions crowded the doorway. A sign on the door read: “This is not a University of Oregon sponsored event.”

The event, drawing in more than 30 students and community members opposing the Forum’s presence on campus, was organized as a basic question-and-answer discussion in which attendees could receive insight on the controversial group — but degrading comments and patronizing laughter interrupted the majority of inquirers.

The Forum, a self-proclaimed free speech group that hosts various speakers at its weekly meetings on campus, has spurred debate and opposition in the last years because of the alleged white supremacy and neo-Nazi tones of the speakers. Prominent Holocaust deniers and heated anti-Semites have presented at meetings, infuriating local Jewish groups and former University President Dave Frohnmayer.

The group’s Web site states: “The Pacifica Forum’s central purpose is to provide information and perspective on the issues of war and peace, militarism and pacifism, violence and non-violence. The Pacifica Forum resists efforts to silence this endeavor.”

The group, labeled as an official “white nationalist hate group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center, is allowed to meet on campus thanks to 94-year-old retired University professor, Orval Etter.

When asked by a former student, “Have you not crossed the line?” Etter remained silent, letting meeting leader Billy Rojas inform the crowd that Etter was “not in the right condition to reply.”

Past speaker Jimmy Marr, who evoked dispute in the previous Dec. 11 meeting for showing an anti-Semitic “documentary,” and who is known for calling Martin Luther King, Jr. a “moral leper and communist dupe,” broke into multiple Nazi salutes throughout the meeting, primarily while Jewish protesters spoke. Past speaker and self-titled white separatist Valdas Anelauskas said the salutes were “just a joke,” denying that the Forum is a neo-Nazi organization.

Rojas’ comment led to a slew of negative feedback from those in opposition, escalating into the chant: “Pacifica Forum off campus!”

Forum critic and member of the Anti-Hate Task Force, Michael Williams rejected the idea that the group was a free-speech haven.

“There is only one point of view covered here, and that point of view is anti,” Williams said. “This is scholarly? This is academic?”

Midway through the event, University senior Katie Hulse questioned a comment Anelauskas made last summer about late feminist Andrea Dworkin, in which he called her “too ugly to rape.”

Smiling, Anelauskas responded, “Don’t worry, you are not ugly.”

Joined by fellow shocked protestors, Hulse walked to the front of the room to where Anelauskas sat.

“Are you saying that you want to rape me?” Hulse asked through tears. “You’re making me uncomfortable. This is unacceptable.”

After Hulse left the room, Marr called her confrontation “theatrical,” adding to the uproar in the opposing crowd.

ASUO President Emma Kallaway attended the event and only spoke up after Hulse’s statement.

“I am observing that I have more upset students against your group than on your side,” Kallaway said. “I have just witnessed you insult a highly educated woman who is a valued member of our campus, and believe that you being here in our student union is a safety issue.”

Kallaway said the EMU is home to the University Women’s Center, Jewish Student Union, Black Student Union and LGBTQ student group, and it is supposed to be a safe area for the diverse student population.

“We don’t want you here in this building,” Kallaway said. “Get out of our safe student union.”

Anelauskas said the Forum would like to meet in its previous venue, a classroom in McKenzie Hall, but added that the group had a right to be there.

“This is a public space,” Anelauskas said. “Also, my daughter is a student here, which gives me some connection.”

His reply was not enough for the crowd of fuming student protesters, who left the meeting to discuss the rights of the Forum on campus with DPS officers.

The final voice of opposition from an unidentified student concluded the meeting on a solemn note: “I am a student at my campus and I fear you.”

azielinski@dailyemerald.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

26 comments

dc
Thu Jan 14 2010 04:32
Google $PLC: TOP entry/link {Beware SPLC Labels Designed to Censor Debate}
for some good information on one of Michael Williams slimier cohorts/mentors.
dc
Thu Jan 14 2010 04:19
Now Michael Williams is leading the lemmings on FaceBook.
God Bless America.

Please re-read posts below, and at the other threads before choosing
to become another of his little followers. He has not a single argument
that stands on its own. Each is well-rehearsed and full of internal inconsistency.

Ethan
Wed Jan 13 2010 23:03
'nameless' says, "...and everyone in favor of Pacifica needs to be put to rest."

Is that your final solution?

Ethan
Wed Jan 13 2010 15:42
And why do you still beat your wife?
Karl S. Bonner
Wed Jan 13 2010 03:16
I'll be at the forum/protest this Friday afternoon. I plan on asking members of Pacifica the following:

"We know what kind of regime the Third Reich was. We know about how they enslaved and oppressed the German people, invaded other nations, annihilated an entire continent in the biggest war ever, and gassed millions of Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, labor activists, peace activists and political dissidents - including many Nazi Party members who grew skeptical of Hitler's strategies. Given what we know about their political, social and economic system, my only question to you is: why do you hate freedom so much?"

nameless
Tue Jan 12 2010 17:29
This awful and disgusting meeting needs to be put to an end immediately, and everyone who is in favor of pacifica needs to be put to rest. I will not be paying tuition and fees to see a neo-nazi group convene on my campus.
brian
Tue Jan 12 2010 14:27
The group, labeled as an official “white nationalist hate group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center - WOW breaking news!! Perhaps you could also add that the Southern Poverty Law Center is a small radical left wing group whos opinion is generally ignored by intelligent people.
Your name
Tue Jan 12 2010 02:04
... You're actually defending it. You're a monster. Really, you're an aweful human being.
dawn coslow
Tue Jan 12 2010 02:00
OOPS. I've not ever tried anything like that before / sorry about the poor formatting tedious post, but it actually only cut off only 1 sentence.

In Dworkin’s obituary the Guardian quotes writer Mimi Spencer who wrote
about Andrea Dworkin that “she looks as though she neither waxes nor
washes, nor flushes nor flosses.”

And so, being “fat” and “hairy,” she was obsessed about rape because no
man would ever want her.

[END SNIP]

dawn coslow
Tue Jan 12 2010 01:55
All Valdas said to Katie is "you are not ugly". (He did not say don't worry.)It was awkward, true, but Williams had just loudly delivered his (obviously rehearsed) diatribe regarding a forum from many months prior (on "RADICAL Feminism"). Many of us would have liked to respond to William's accusatory telling (read "skewing") of that blip-in-time, but was too late for clarity or context in the mayhem that ensued--the dramatics had begun. Toward Clarity (Better late than never): Dawn,Here (below) is an excerpt from my lecture where you can see what exactly(and in what context) was said about Dworkin and rape. VALDAS============================================================[...]Then, in June 2000, Dworkin published two controversial articles inBritish newspapers New Statesman and the Guardian, stating that one ormore men had raped her in her hotel room in Paris the previous year,putting drugs in her drink to disable her.In May 1999, while reading a book on “French literary fascism” and sippinga kir royale in a Paris hotel garden, Dworkin was, according to heraccount, slipped some kind of drug by a barman. Back in her room, reelingfrom the narcotic, she was savagely raped by two hotel staff members (shebelieved, by a barman and a waiter), she said. [Obituary, The Times, April13, 2005]This was, as later described by British author and journalist CharlotteRaven, a “widely disbelieved claim.” [“Body of Evidence,” New Statesman,June 19, 2006.]Well, as it could be expected, her articles ignited quite a bit of publiccontroversy, polarizing opinion between skeptics and supporters.Seizing upon inconsistencies in her two essays about the incident,published in the Guardian and the New Statesman, and her failure tocontact hotel security or police, many even among fellow feministssuggested the rape did not happen.“Dworkin seems to think her story should be taken as further evidence ofmasculine malevolence,” said Julia Gracen in Salon’s article “AndreaDworkin in Agony.” [September 20, 2000]“I think it is fair to say that few people believed Andrea Dworkin’saccount of her drug-rape in a Paris Hotel room in 1999. Even sympatheticobituarists felt bound to suggest that the catalogue of abuse thatfollowed Dworkin all her life, and which fuelled her writings, was viewedwith suspicion in many quarters,” says Deborah Orr in obituary publishedby The Independent. [April 16, 2005]“Dworkin, an anti-rape activist who has devoted much time and energy tobattling the crime, decided not to inform the police or hotel securitywhen she realized what had happened to her. . .” [Gracen, Salon]Even Dworkin’s so-called “husband,” gay feminist John Stoltenberg, who bythat time has lived with Dworkin for 25 years, did not really believe her.“John looked for any other explanation than rape,” Dworkin writes. “Heabandoned me emotionally. [Gracen, Salon]This response, though, did not surprise Dworkin. “If the Holocaust can bedenied even today,” she said, “how can a woman who has been raped bebelieved?” [Katharine Viner, The Guardian, April 12, 2005]Well, some commentators even claimed that the rape most likely occurred inher dreams.Michael Lamport Commons, a researcher with Harvard Medical School’sProgram in Psychiatry and Law, said: “Lying is a concept of free will.People have to know that they are telling untruths in order to bejustifiably called liars.” [Gracen, Salon]He was not sure that is the case with Dworkin: “While rare, people havedreams of being raped, which appear real to them . . . Many characterdisorders, including borderline personality, involve ‘lying’ and notknowing one lies.” [Gracen, Salon]Well, as I see it, her obsession with rape possibly led her to fantasizeabout having been herself a victim of rape; become deluded that she had infact been raped herself.“I believe that the reason why Dworkin was so extreme in her beliefs aboutmen, was because she experienced an extreme life not just as a woman butas an unattractive, clever woman.” [Deborah Orr, The Independent]As Deborah Orr says, “For yet more though, Dworkin was simply too fat andugly to receive any sexual attention at all -- and a nutcase to boot.”[Deborah Orr, The Independent]Yes, even in obituaries after her death many writers didn’t fail tomention how ugly she was.She indeed was morbidly obese, devastatingly ugly and repulsive in everyconceivable way.While the majority of women seek to be attractive, Dworkin sought to be ugly.Her refusal to make any concessions to feminine beauty was bound up in herphilosophy, not least because while some women regarded it as an act ofbravery, others saw it as a symptom of her problems. “Dworkin pretends tobe a daring truth-teller,” wrote the feminist Camille Paglia, “but nevermentions her most obvious problem, food.” [Obituary, The Telegraph, April13, 2005]In Dworkin’s obituary the Guardian quotes writer Mimi Spencer who wroteabout Andrea Dworkin that “she looks as though she neither waxes norwashes, nor flushes nor flosses.”And so, being...
Your name
Tue Jan 12 2010 00:53
"If someone says :"I'm going to hit you", that could be violent speech. Jokes about feminists are not."

But according to this story it was a joke about raping feminists, and it was directed at someone who was in the room. (Quote: "Don’t worry, you are not ugly.")

You left that part out.

Saron L
Tue Jan 12 2010 00:38
Student union politicians have always tended to be Stalinists, for some reason. Emma Kallaway wants to shut down freedom of speech because she doesn't feel safe. In law, it is not enough to say you don't feel safe to classify words as violence. It is that if a REASONABLE person would fear for their safety that the words may not be covered by the First Amendment. If someone says :"I'm going to hit you", that could be violent speech. Jokes about feminists are not. Kallaway and co. try to undermine academic freedom by using weasel words like 'diversity' when they mean 'the party line'.
Your name
Tue Jan 12 2010 00:26
She adds to the embarrassment of having the PF on campus
Your name
Tue Jan 12 2010 00:07
Dawn Coslow is freaking insane, isn't she? Holy cow.
Reality Check
Mon Jan 11 2010 23:58
Dawn-
This is your circus. It will soon be laid to rest, along with Etter.
I think you should focus more on how YOU will go on without it, rather than toss the blame around in your usual ignorant manner.
dc
Mon Jan 11 2010 23:19
Williams said:
I don't believe there were more than 12-15 supporters, including the 8 1/2 regulars in attendance.

dc says:
Pacifica did not put out any call for attendance, and expected a small group.

I noticed a few of your hired plants were there, MW, what percs will they receive this time? And I've been wondering, once your little house of 'cards' falls, and you are widely recognized as the slimy opportunist those of us "close" to you, KNOW you to be, will you crawl back beneath a different state's rocks, or have you so pleased your superiors that you plan to stay in Eugene, comfortable regardless of the FACT that a large(r) percent of your community will know you as the shill that sold his soul to fall upwards, by duping them./?

MW also said:
“This is scholarly? This is academic?”

That was YOUR circus, not Pacifica's. And as much as we "Pacificaars" may have fallen short at that "invasion of the incited", I'd like for you to know that your performance was a transparent FLOP and your nakedness was showing. To have had to cherrypick and deliver an obscure comment from last summer was low, no doubt, but it shows ya got nothing real.

AT LEAST FOR ONCE you used (albeit twisted) a SPECIFIC, as opposed to those hot-button generalizations, you and your 'ghost' writers at the $PLC, ADL & CALC ["Creating Antisemitism in Lane County] have promulgated far and wide.

I know you're trying now to distance your Hate-Patrol from CALC (ADL recommendation?) but it won't work. The timeline of your attacks is your Achilles heal. And the TRUTH is in the timeline. You will be revealed.

Tired and bored
Mon Jan 11 2010 20:22
Orval Etter is 94. You all realize that this conflict will solve itself in a very natural, easy way, in the very near future, right?

I don't like having these guys around either, but they've been getting attention for this stuff for YEARS. While we wait for the inevitable to occur, I'd rather spend my fridays drinking beer and celebrating the things that make life important (love, learning new things, meeting new people, making everyone around me know that I accept them for who they are, more beer, etc.) than protesting these guys. I plan on rejecting their values through the way I live my life every day... I don't need to actually dignify their organization with my presence at their events to oppose everything that they stand for.

Let them have their sad little room and their precious free speech. We all know that their ideas will die with them, so why give them power over your lives on the way to their graves? I hate seeing youth wasting time fighting the ghosts of the past, when they could instead be building the future that we all want to see. I wish my incidental fees weren't subsidising their events through power bills and room cleaning, sure... But seeing ideas that held the world in a grip of terror in our grandparents day reduced to this pathetic little menagerie is almost worth the financial burden. It validates everything I believe in.

The Pacifica Forum is dead. The reaper just hasn't made it 'round yet. He's a busy dude.

Fact
Mon Jan 11 2010 18:46
That's a very uneducated comment.
sid
Mon Jan 11 2010 17:30
Judge the photo of the protesters............mmmm not a very intelligent lookin bunch
Wii
Mon Jan 11 2010 17:25
As always, freedom of speech only applies to what you agree with. I guess the protesters did not even get the point that the forum members were saying things just to get them going - and it appears that they suceeded!!






log out