College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Food, water should be free for all

Guest Commentary

Published: Sunday, March 7, 2010

Updated: Monday, March 8, 2010 00:03

If you took Biology 101, you may remember “Natural Law 1: Every human needs adequate nutrition, clean air and clean water, and, therefore, must respect the symbiotic environmental processes relevant to those needs.”

Air is abundant; therefore, it’s free. Nobody charges others for breathing air. With desalination technology, we can now turn (rising) salty water into fresh water, and we do! Until recently, only 1 percent of the earth’s water could be used for drinking and irrigation. Now, almost 100 percent is available. Water can now become abundant, and should therefore become free. No more wars over fresh water (like Israel-Palestine), or death and disease due to lack of clean water.

With hydroponic technology, we can now grow anything with just water and electricity, and we do! We now grow food in deserts and the poles. If food no longer requires land or sun, we can grow anything anywhere and on a vertical scale. Imagine a tall building with a different vegetable or fruit in every floor. We can get rid of all world famines and malnutrition. In fact, every vegetable and fruit would become equally available everywhere. We can make food abundant anywhere, and therefore free everywhere. Every year, millions of people die from lack of clean water or inadequate nutrition. Thanks to hydroponic agriculture, millions of lives (and much more suffering) can be saved
every year.

But if hydroponic agriculture requires water and electricity, and only water is free, how do you acquire and pay electricity? Well, the only clean, safe, environmental, sustainable and recyclable energy is electricity that comes from geothermal, solar, wind, and wave energy.

Some people wonder how much of today’s world energy needs can be produced if we combine these four sources. It turns out, geothermal, solar or wind alone would be enough. Geothermal equals 4,000-plus years of power; solar equals 10,000 times current world’s needs; 20 percent of wind equals all world’s current needs; wave equals 50 percent of the world’s needs. In fact, 34 percent of the UK’s energy can come from tides (far less powerful than waves). Energy would be so overabundant that electricity would be free.

Some people say “I don’t like electric cars because they can’t go faster than 80 mph.” Well, look at your dashboard: who drives 150 mph? Why make road signs that say “speed limit 70 miles,” when you can design cars not to exceed those limits. If all cars were electric, and electricity is free, then there’s no more paying for gas (or borrowing money from China to pay Saudi oil), and no more polluting the air.

Like air, water, food and electricity can now be free. No more water or electric bills. Free trips to the grocery store. No more deaths and suffering due to poverty and famine. No more work is necessary once you own a home and a vehicle. No more crimes due to hunger and unemployment. Why aren’t we living in this world?

People die every day from lack of clean water, not because it’s unavailable, but because they can’t buy it. A decade ago, the oil industry “killed” GM’s electric car, and is now doing everything it can to prevent other sources of energy from growing. Pollution in air, water, and soil are not just causing cancer, disease and death (Natural Law 1); air pollution is also causing global warming, causing the extinction of species 1,000 times faster than the natural rate.

Every year, 34,000 children die from poverty and disease. It’s time we grow up. In the future, people will look back at this time and call our system and lifestyle “primitive.”

opinion@dailyemerald.com

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

32 comments

Anonymous
Thu Mar 18 2010 12:10
These comments are by COLLEGE STUDENTS? Amazing.
Anonymous
Tue Mar 16 2010 10:34
The vast majority of Americans already live in circumstances where a *minimal* amount of "public" water and electricity are available. And, I might add, "free" sewer use, police and fire protection, emergency medical aid, road repair, and even recreational facilities. But if you want more than a minimum of these things, you are expected to pay for them. This makes sense, otherwise it would contribute to waste.

That being said, the one area of contention is food, and whether minimal food should be free as well to all. Most consumers would say "no", but in America, from a food *production* point of view, it might make a great deal of sense, and actually save the taxpayers a lot of money. This is because American agribusiness has been over-productive for so long, that excess food is a major problem.

Even during the Dust Bowl, which wiped out tens of thousands of farmers, leading into the Great Depression, the remaining farmers produced so very much food that deflation made it worthless. Corn was being burned for fuel at the same time people elsewhere were starving. So the government had to intervene, to both slash the excess, and redistribute some of the abundance to the hungry. It raised the prices to sensible levels, stabilized the market, and stopped a lot of suffering.

And taxpayers have been paying a fortune since then to limit production, support prices, and stop over-production, resulting in mountains of food rotting in expensive storage in government warehouses, every year. We just need to get rid of a huge amount of food. So why not give it away, to anyone who wants it?

Ironically, since most food is in a basic form, like fresh apples, for example, consumption by "paying customers" is pretty stable, as they prefer processed food. Stable consumption means that there are lots of seasonal floods of produce, which threaten to crash prices. So giving away lots of apples at the peak of the season actually stabilizes prices, without the government having to pay extra money for storage and subsidies.

By giving away *minimal* food, to anyone who wants it, would save the taxpayers a LOT of money. And even some limited amounts of processed foods, like common bread and cheese, can be thrown into deal as well. There is no reason to hold back with this abundance.

Nik
Sun Mar 14 2010 00:25
Anonymous post written 21:51, your ignorance behooves me:

Your argument is one for redistribution, not what a "right" is. Just because other people can pay for it doesn't mean you have a “right” to it. This is not to say one shouldn't help others to the best of ones own individual abilities; but, you should take time to understand what a "right" is.

For starters, a "right" is not something that is given to you by others (like food and water). Instead, it is something that can never be taken. Example: one has a "right" to free speech (this cannot physically be taken away). However, one does not have a "right" to a soap box on which to practice ones freedom of speech. Another example: one has a right to take care of oneself and work to make one healthy. One does not have a right to force others to pay for ones health care.

Because I understand the difference between a “right” and an entitlement does not mean I don’t “think about other people” and can’t “think outside the rich box I live in.”

I say again, your ignorance behooved me…

Thomas Jefferson
Sat Mar 13 2010 06:30
HAHAHAH Here here, Nick!
Nicholas
Fri Mar 12 2010 15:07
If only there were some magic way to ensure the right to everything for everyone without having to actually work for it. hell with all these rights we have why not make sex a human right (its smack dab on Maslow's hierarchy of needs after all) and have government subsidized brothels. Feeling safe, inebriation, they can all be human rights just let your imagination take you away (as an aside creating a city-wide plumbing system which delivers Ninkasi definitely seems like a right. Your sink would have hot water cold water and booze.)
Fat Jared
Fri Mar 12 2010 02:56
Food and Water is a right huh? Yeah, when you work for it. I am sitting here, eating my foot long sub, drinking an ice cold pepsi and letting my water run continuously because guess what I PAY FOR IT. Get a job.
Anonymous
Thu Mar 11 2010 21:51
I'm glad everyone who is ranting about this article just ate their lunch and drank from their water bottle. We have what we want, and much more than what we actually need.

Food and water is a human right. The author is thinking about other people and I commend him for doing so. Everyone needs to think outside of their rich world box and consider what happens when the access to water and food is so difficult that people in the periphery get sick and die. Think about others, not just the profit lost from selling food and water.

nicholas
Wed Mar 10 2010 22:25
o well i stand corrected
Mohamed
Wed Mar 10 2010 17:35
I'm not speaking at the event. I'm just organizing it. We'll watch 3 x 30 min documentaries & discuss them in group...
Nicholas Stachelrodt
Wed Mar 10 2010 16:41
This guy is absolutely serious he is speaking about it this Saturday. Go to www.zday2010.org/worldwide-map and look up the information for the eugene oregon event...if only he was kidding.
MNDuck
Wed Mar 10 2010 14:22
It's a joke - FTW!!

Well Done!

Anonymous
Tue Mar 9 2010 01:19
I volunteer to enslave Mohamed Jemmali so we can have this "free" food he speaks of.
Tom
Tue Mar 9 2010 01:16
I can't believe this guy is a teacher. A total discredit to UO and anyone associated with UO. Trust me, this isnt his only thought of lunacy.
Mohamed Craziest!
Mon Mar 8 2010 23:53
If you think unemployement will go back to 5% or even go below 8% again, think again:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCXDXFTmLbI
The question is not will technology replace jobs; the question is when, and at which unemployment rate will the monetary system collapse, and will humans avoid a bloody revolution before transitioning to a resource-based economy.
Transferring jobs abroad is a minor problem compared to technological unemployment, which replaced agriculture, then manufacturing, and now the service industry, only this time, there's no new sector to transfer to...
Anonymous
Mon Mar 8 2010 18:36
Ancient man were either hunters or gatherers, eventually becoming farmers. Guess what...FREE FOOD.

Then one day a farmer traded some of his crops that he grew for a deer the hunter killed.

Then someone learned to fish, and he traded some of his fish for a deer and some vegetables.

Then someone learned how to build huts, and built a hut for himself. All his friends wanted huts to, but he couldn't build huts and farm and hunt at the same time. So his fishing friend gave him some fish in exchange for a hut. His farmer friend gave him fruits and vegetables for a hut. And his hunting friend gave him some deer a quail for a hut.

As time went buy and more people learned to do more things, more things were traded. And people began to trade some of the things they received in trade for other things they wanted.

Eventually money was develeoped, and people traded things for money. Then they would trade some of this money for other things. Today we call this buying and selling.

As time went by more and more trades were developed, that people would receive money in trade for their goods or services. After awhile someone began teaching others how to do these other trades, and the received money for teaching others how to do things.

Today Mr. Jemmali trades his time of teaching students about biology, for money. He can then in turn trade some of his money for food.

Mr Jemmali has CHOSEN to be a teacher and trade his time teaching for money, and then to BUY food. He could also decide to grow all his own "FREE" food, but then he might not have the time to teach.

We all CHOOSE our line of livelyhood. We choose to trade hours for $$$. Everything in life costs something. We chose how to trade our $$$ for the items we need or want.

Anonymous
Mon Mar 8 2010 17:42
You're right Nik! There's no way I can articulate the logic behind my many "insane" arguments in 1 article. That takes a book (which I'm also working on). However, you can also find the answers at this Sat event (see my comment below)...
Crazier Mohamed!
Mon Mar 8 2010 17:39
By the way, I have a Bachelor & Master in Business in the US, which are degrees on how to survive in the current system, but also on how to compete w/your neighbors & screw future generations for personal benefits. Insane are those who don't question & challenge this system & prefer living as slaves of the system for the rest of their lives. Insane are those who think that the monetray system will continue to exist as long as humans exist. Insane are people who already forgot that the global economy almost collapsed 1 yr ago b/c of capitalism. Every social progress began w/an insane idea, and visionary people are used to being called "insane" before they one day become heroes... This is not my idea, but I wish it was!
Nik
Mon Mar 8 2010 17:27
Mr. Jemmali,

We should grow up? You publish this unsubstantiated opinion, void of any logical reasoning, and WE should grow up? Now that you have attempted to articulate this philosophy, you have a duty to explain how the most essential elements of human life can be free. God speed

Crazy Mohamed!
Mon Mar 8 2010 17:21
The Emerald took out the last sentence, which announces the annual worldwide event/celebration (this Saturday at UO) related to the article. This movement has realistic goals, has attracted the best scientists, & already (after 3 years) has over 350,000 members in over 200 countries, including over 65,000 in every state here in the US. This century is when humanity can use technology to put an end to corruption, diseases, famine, pollution, unemployment, wars, & slavery. Hopefully, our grandchildren will look back at our current society & call us "primitive". It's time we grow up.
This Saturday March 13, ZDay is celebrated in over 100 countries & in 4 major cities in OR. In Eugene, we'll celebrate ZDay at UO. Free attendance. RSVP at: www.zday2010.org/worldwide-map
It's a joke!
Mon Mar 8 2010 17:06
Mr. Jemmali, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.






log out