Quantcast Oregon Daily Emerald - University of Oregon news, sports & entertainment
College Media Network
  • Blogs
  • Calendar
  • Archives
  • Buy Photos
  • Advertising
  • Classifieds
  • Contact Us

|

Home > News

Occupants Ousted

50 residents were forced to vacate their homes as Aldersgate apartments scramble to meet city safety code

by Jessie Higgins | News reporter

PUBLISHED ON 10/6/08 IN News
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Residents of the Capri Apartments on Alder Street watch as construction crews work to fix the building's unsafe deck railings in order to bring the complex up to city safety code.
Media Credit: Thomas Martinez
Residents of the Capri Apartments on Alder Street watch as construction crews work to fix the building's unsafe deck railings in order to bring the complex up to city safety code.

Nearly 50 residents, including many students, were forced to temporarily vacate their homes near campus Thursday night after the city discovered the building they were living in had been labeled "unsafe to occupy" more than three weeks earlier.

City officials say the property owners had begun renovating the building at 1436 Alder St. without obtaining the necessary permits, and were therefore not complying with several city safety and building codes.

The students were allowed to return to their apartments Friday evening after the property manger had construction crews work through the night and fix the immediate danger the city had outlined, which were the unsafe and poorly-installed guard railings on the building's outer decks. Capri Apartments at The University of Oregon, the on-site apartment manager, arranged to have all students who could not find another place to sleep stay at one of two local hotels.

On Sept. 10, Eugene building official Stuart Ramsing ordered the apartment complex to be closed and posted as "dangerous" and "unsafe to occupy" after the city received an anonymous tip there was construction being done on the building. When code enforcers inspected the building, they noticed several code violations that threatened the safety of the building's inhabitants, including the poorly-installed guard railings.

But despite the notice, University student Lizzie Falconer and other residents were allowed to move in on Sept. 15 - just five days after the building was labeled unsafe.

WHAT HAPPENED



THE PROBLEM

An apartment complex on Alder Street allowed students to move in though renovations were incomplete and the city labeled the complex "unsafe."

THE COMPANY'S RESPONSE

"We are trying to provide the very best units in the area and spending so much money to do it and it seems like the city's trying to come back and slap us in the face," said Andrew Bolton, director of acquisitions at MHE Properties, a California-based company overseeing the development of the building.

WHAT ABOUT THE STUDENTS?

They were allowed to move back into their apartments, and they are receiving help from ASUO Legal Services.


Falconer, who moved into one of the apartment's quad-style rooms, said the "unsafe to occupy" signs had been removed from the building before she checked-in to receive her room key.

"We went out there (last Thursday) and were surprised to find that the building was occupied," Ramsing said, adding that when the city initially inspected the apartment, the units were unoccupied. "That surprised us, and that was why we acted so quickly to get the tenants out of the building."

After some confusion Thursday evening, representatives from the local property manager's national office flew in from California to work with the city to bring the building back into code compliance and allow the students to return.

"The notice on Sept. 10 just said we needed to get a permit," said Nate Akiva, managing director of the apartment complex. "We complied with the city's request to get that permit, and that's why the students were allowed to move in on the 15th."

The posted notice stated: "The owner or person in responsible charge of this property must obtain the necessary permits to remedy the unsafe condition or demolish the building within 10 days of this notice or the city will proceed to do so ... It is a violation of law to occupy this building or to remove or deface this notice."

Andrew Bolton, the director of acquisitions at MHE Properties, a California-based company overseeing the development of the building, insisted they had all the necessary permits to build and had been working with the city, a claim Ramsing refutes.

Falconer said that when she and her roommates moved into the building on Sept. 15, their apartment was still under construction.

"Jamie and I walked in and said, 'Oh my god, our apartment is not even done!'" Falconer said.

Falconer said that initially none of the drains in the apartment were functioning, the apartment had not been cleaned, there were construction supplies left in the area, and the top of a vent from an old stove range left a hole in the ceiling.

"My toilet wasn't running right," said Melissa Berg, a sophomore who moved in Sept. 20. "It would flush automatically. I would be lying in bed and hear my toilet flush."

Bolton, however, said the building's construction was completely on schedule and at the time students moved in on the 15th the interiors of the apartments were fully completed.

"One-hundred percent of the interior was done," Bolton said. He added that some exterior work remained to be completed.

Falconer said she and her roommates spent days attempting to contact Capri Apartments to get things in their apartment finished and working properly, but received no word back.

"We called Capri, left messages, e-mailed, went over to the office - the only way to get things fixed was to talk to the construction workers," said Falconer.

Sheryl Eyster, associate director of student life, said the University's Office of Student life met with several of the 48 students living at the apartment building on Friday to offer support and direct any legal questions they have to the ASUO Legal Services.

The office will meet with the students again today to discuss legal rights and other options the students have.

"Dealing with Capri has been a horrible experience," Falconer said. "They have not taken responsibility for all the things that have gone wrong."

Representatives from Capri Apartments declined to comment for this story, but Bolton of MHE Properties defended their work.

"We are trying to provide the very best units in area, and spending so much money to do it, and it seems like the city's trying to come back and slap us in the face," he said.

Ramsing said now that the initial safety concerns of the building have been addressed, the city will begin a longer process of determining what other codes may have been violated during the construction process over the summer.

"We'll hopefully be able to work this out with (the city)," Akiva said. "They've been very helpful so far ... we're hoping this won't cause any long term issues."



jhiggins@dailyemerald.com
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 9 of 10

West campus resident

posted 10/06/08 @ 3:25 AM PST

And thus, this shows the housing problem that exists around the West Campus Neighborhood. There is limited housing, apartments are EXTREMELY overpriced, poor management, crappy buildings (sometimes unsafe), etc. (Continued…)

Orwellduk

posted 10/06/08 @ 12:18 PM PST

This is why I testified against the ASUO "housing code". Those who pushed it got jobs related to it and created a fucked up policy. Thanks ASUO morons!(just a note the two current ASUO exec. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Ryan

posted 10/06/08 @ 3:08 PM PST

I live in Capri, and when we moved in the 15th, a ton of stuff wasn't finished. None of the rooms or bathrooms had door knobs. We have yet to get the "fabulous" TV that is promised in the brochure, and the people that work in the office very disorganized and rude. (Continued…)

Poop

posted 10/06/08 @ 4:28 PM PST

I'm also going through Capri apartments. We were promised flatscreen TVs with the place. My mates and I all moved in on the 15th. We still don't have the TV, almost a MONTH later. (Continued…)

Hugabaloo

posted 10/07/08 @ 11:41 AM PST

I also live at Capri. They are actually very nicely done, and 100000x better than the other junk in the area (last year). I can roll out of bed and go to class, not bike miles across a river (FYI its not cold yet). (Continued…)

Jessica Morehead

posted 10/09/08 @ 5:44 PM PST

THanks for doing this article, Capri has deceived students and they shouldn't be allowed to get away with it.

Eric Gross

posted 10/13/08 @ 11:48 AM PST

I'm not surprised to hear this. You've got high demand for nearby housing and many newer students haven't been through the ropes of renting yet. So it ends up being a landlord's market where they can get away with extreme profits and poor service. (Continued…)

dorothy

posted 10/14/08 @ 9:13 AM PST

i have a 2 bedroom small house way out near river rd. and irving, and i need a roommate sooner or later,but i'm a 61 yr. old disabled woman,and i'm having to back-ground check carefully,and i need a more mature person,so i have not openly advertised; trying to go thru friends;it'san older house,surrounded by trees,very green,trying to find roomie who likes to garden,grow vegetable garden,outdoorsy person, collaberate on growing lots of our own food. (Continued…)

orwellduk

posted 10/14/08 @ 9:42 AM PST

The housing code was a ASUO/city of Eugene designed solution to a more complicated problem. Both ASUO and city of Eugene have no interest in getting to the heart of all the housing problems facing UO students. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.


MULTIMEDIA
MORE MULTIMEDIA

AP NEWS VIDEO

Advertisement




Sponsored Links

Sex Toys

Advertisement