Home > Opinion
Holy Cow debate isn't so black and white
Editorial
by Emerald Editorial Board |
| |
|
The EMU is owned and funded by students. Its operating budget is made up of earned revenue (primarily from food sales) and student fees. This revenue currently isn't cutting it. Even though the EMU plans to pay off its existing debt later this year, it will then have to contend with more than $10 million of deferred maintenance. For example, two out of the three motors that are supposed to power the building's heating system broke over winter break.
At the same time, the EMU has reached its capacity for bringing in earned revenue. That means that the EMU cannot squeeze more money out of the spaces it has, unless it replaces what is there.
Holy Cow's owner says it should stay because it is more vegetarian, more organic and more local than Laughing Planet.
Laughing Planet serves chicken, but it has plenty of vegetarian items and close to everything on its menu is vegan-friendly. All of its sauces and salad dressings are vegan, and it has vegan cheese and sour cream. Also, Laughing Planet was awarded "best vegetarian" by Eugene Weekly.
Even though Laughing Planet was founded in Indiana, it is now based in Portland, which makes it only slightly less local than Holy Cow.
Holy Cow is more organic than Laughing Planet, and boasts that 98 percent of its ingredients are organic. However, Laughing Planet prefers to focus on locally grown food. The owner says it doesn't calculate the percentage of its food that is organic because it varies by the season, and because organic isn't necessarily best for the planet. Laughing Planet instead prefers Food Alliance certified ingredients. Food Alliance standards include safe and fair conditions for workers and reduced pesticide usage, in addition to the conservation of soil, water and wildlife habitats.
Allegations that Laughing Planet is greenwashed are ludicrous. Beyond its food, it offers - like Holy Cow - non-disposable dishes and silverware for people eating in. Its disposable dishes and silverware are all biodegradable. Laughing Planet fits the EMU's criteria for its organic, locally supplied, vegan and vegetarian restaurant. The decision to replace a food vendor is an unpalatable decision. There is an intrinsic value in a place like Holy Cow, which only exists on campus. It created the space it now inhabits in the food court, and is active in the University community. Nevertheless, the EMU needs to make more money, and Laughing Planet will allow them to do that, primarily by accepting debit and credit cards and offering some menu items that include meat.
Since the EMU chose Laughing Planet, Holy Cow has ordered a credit card machine, but it is too late to affect the lease decision.
Food vendors pay the EMU 8 percent of their sales, so more business for the vendors translates to higher revenues for the EMU.
The one other way it can raise revenue is to raise student fees.
In the end, what will serve students the best is having a place that won't further wreck the planet and offers healthy food to vegans, vegetarians and omnivores alike. At the same time, it will help the EMU need less money from students. This is what Laughing Planet will give students, and it's more than Holy Cow can offer. Although it may be a hard pill to swallow, the EMU made the right choice. Sometimes, change is a good thing.
2008 Woodie Awards

Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 19
Vivian
posted 2/08/08 @ 12:10 PM PST
At first, I agree with you on the main points: LP doesn't deserve to be compared to McDonald, and EMU could use a few extra bucks.
But towards the end the article turned into bovine scat. (Continued…)
Robert Kirkpatrick
posted 2/08/08 @ 12:18 PM PST
Finally we are getting somewhere!
The biggest cause of all the stirred up emotions in this debate has been the lack of quality information. For instance, until last weekend Laughing Planet didn't have a functioning website. (Continued…)
Megan McClellan
posted 2/08/08 @ 12:36 PM PST
Only slightly less local? A Bloomington, Indiana and Portland based chain is 'only slightly less local' than a mom and pop cafe that has been on campus and serving students for 10 years? Please. (Continued…)
Stephan
posted 2/08/08 @ 2:58 PM PST
"Only slightly less local than Holy Cow"? That honestly made me laugh out loud. Since when is localness a continuum?
Regarding the chicken and all that. (Continued…)
Steak and Eggs
posted 2/08/08 @ 5:29 PM PST
The only thing I'm wondering, is how can ya'll even pretend to care about things like the enviroment, and whether or not ingredients are local or not, but then you can quietly pay BIG bucks to a school that has sold its soul to Phil Knight? I mean the guy runs your college like a puppet show, buying his buddies high level admin jobs, telling ya'll what labor treaties you can sign onto. (Continued…)
Kelly Rini
posted 2/09/08 @ 11:25 PM PST
Despite the EMU needing "to make more money" (What's more important than making more money? Nothing, apparently.), it's doubtful that replacing the Holy Cow with Laughing Planet is going to solve any of the EMU's revenue issues. (Continued…)
Tom Baxter
posted 2/10/08 @ 2:12 PM PST
Your recent editorial over the impending loss of the Holy Cow CafĂ© at the food court in the EMU shows a blatant disrespect for an established and compassionate business. (Continued…)
Anton Ferreira
posted 2/11/08 @ 9:14 AM PST
What is it with you guys and Holy Cow? First it was "Dirty Hippies, Take a Hike and Get a Life!" Now its, "Fiscal Responsibility Made Them Do It!"
The notion that replacing Holy cow with Laughing Planet will get the EMU out of its financial mess is, well, laughable. (Continued…)
Post a Comment