Quantcast Oregon Daily Emerald - University of Oregon news, sports & entertainment
College Media Network
  • Blogs
  • Calendar
  • Archives
  • Buy Photos
  • Advertising
  • Classifieds
  • Contact Us

|

Home > Opinion

Stipend money still needs to be repaid

Editorial

by Emerald Editorial Board |

PUBLISHED ON 10/22/07 IN Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
The discussion of the role of the ASUO Constitution Court in campus politics is beginning to sound like a broken record. We keep repeating that as the body that interprets and enforces the ASUO Constitution, a body that has no oversight of its decisions, the court is the ultimate authority on the rules. Therefore, it seems reasonable to expect the justices to be held to the highest level of accountability.

Last spring, the Emerald reported that former Constitution Court Justice Jerome Roberts had worked for the court, collecting $375 of student fees while he was not a University student. At the time, Roberts told the Emerald he was working out a repayment plan with then ASUO President Jared Axelrod and Finance Coordinator Madeline Wigen, a plan he has since neglected to fulfill even partially.

Roberts' excuse, that it didn't occur to him that he could no longer keep a job students pay for once he left the University, was at best weak and at worst an example of a frighteningly inept justice sitting on the court.

The Green Tape Notebook - made up of the ASUO Constitution, rules and governing documents of all ASUO bodies - states that court justices must be current students. This is the very document justices are charged with upholding. If even one member serving on the court is unaware of such a basic rule, it is a sign that something is severely wrong.

It is difficult to believe the matter simply slipped Roberts' mind for three months. While it is one thing to simply neglect to resign, it is another to collect three monthly checks. Although the first check might be forgivable, three is simply unfathomable. It is hard to believe he did not consider whether it was OK to cash those checks.

The matter never would have been at issue again if Roberts had made any attempt to repay the debt. But because this is not the case, we must ask why he has not, especially in light of the fact that Roberts has expressed plans to return to the University and a desire to serve on the court again.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.


MULTIMEDIA
MORE MULTIMEDIA

AP NEWS VIDEO

Advertisement




Sponsored Links

Sex Toys

Advertisement