2008 Woodie Awards
Home > Commentary
Post-finals course evaluations benefit students
Editorial
by Emerald Editorial Board |
PUBLISHED ON 2/21/07 IN Commentary
Every term, professors give their students an opportunity to have a say. Course evaluations are often overlooked as a part of the academic process, as many students view the process as irrelevant.
At the moment, professors can choose to have students fill out course evaluations during either Dead Week or during Finals Week. At a recent University Senate meeting, associate professor of psychology Bertram Malle said that the scheduling of course evaluations during Finals Week is "potentially disastrous." Malle believes that course evaluations should only be written during Dead Week in order to prevent students from being influenced by "the subjective experience of the final exam, which is not diagnostic of the course's value or the instructor's teaching quality."
Malle makes a good, but ultimately flawed point. Professors constantly manipulate the subjective course-evaluation process. Professors have handed out candy on evaluation day or preceded the day with an easy week of watching videos. When evaluating a course, students should be able to consider all of its contents - especially its final.
As a cumulative assessment of what students have learned throughout a course, the final is especially important to consider when formulating an opinion of the course as a whole. A final incommensurate with the rest of the class is indicative of a problem within the course or in the quality of instruction and should be noted on evaluations. Instructors who structure their classes well should have no problem with allowing students to evaluate them after final exams are administered.
The University should look at reforming the process to ensure that students and faculty get the most out of the evaluation process. Using DuckWeb, the University could institute an online process by which students could have a window - a full week or longer - to fill out evaluations.
Course evaluations should mean something important. Some might fear that an online evaluation process would be less trustworthy than its in-class counterpart, and also that the process would cease being "mandatory." This fear is unfounded. Evaluations are often issued during the last 10 minutes of class, when distracted students are itching to leave the classroom. Even students who want to write something substantive sometimes cannot come up with anything during the allotted time, and many simply leave shortly after the professor has left without filling out an evaluation at all.
At the moment, professors can choose to have students fill out course evaluations during either Dead Week or during Finals Week. At a recent University Senate meeting, associate professor of psychology Bertram Malle said that the scheduling of course evaluations during Finals Week is "potentially disastrous." Malle believes that course evaluations should only be written during Dead Week in order to prevent students from being influenced by "the subjective experience of the final exam, which is not diagnostic of the course's value or the instructor's teaching quality."
Malle makes a good, but ultimately flawed point. Professors constantly manipulate the subjective course-evaluation process. Professors have handed out candy on evaluation day or preceded the day with an easy week of watching videos. When evaluating a course, students should be able to consider all of its contents - especially its final.
As a cumulative assessment of what students have learned throughout a course, the final is especially important to consider when formulating an opinion of the course as a whole. A final incommensurate with the rest of the class is indicative of a problem within the course or in the quality of instruction and should be noted on evaluations. Instructors who structure their classes well should have no problem with allowing students to evaluate them after final exams are administered.
The University should look at reforming the process to ensure that students and faculty get the most out of the evaluation process. Using DuckWeb, the University could institute an online process by which students could have a window - a full week or longer - to fill out evaluations.
Course evaluations should mean something important. Some might fear that an online evaluation process would be less trustworthy than its in-class counterpart, and also that the process would cease being "mandatory." This fear is unfounded. Evaluations are often issued during the last 10 minutes of class, when distracted students are itching to leave the classroom. Even students who want to write something substantive sometimes cannot come up with anything during the allotted time, and many simply leave shortly after the professor has left without filling out an evaluation at all.
Be the first to comment on this story