College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Is health care a right?

Pair against universal health care victors of debate team exhibition

By CJ Ciaramella | News reporter

Print this article

Published: Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, November 4, 2009

The University debate team gave students an earful last night at an exhibition debate on health care between two of its best teams.

Held in Gerlinger Lounge, the exhibition debate centered around the resolution “health care is not a human right,” with one side arguing for the statement and one against. The event’s hot-button topic gave students an introduction to collegiate debate and the University’s team, which won a national championship in the 2008-09 school year.
After each side gave its introductory arguments, they went to work picking apart each other’s points and trying to convince the audience of their own.

“America is the hub of the medical industry, and we can transform it from an industry that creates structural inequality to one that alleviates it,” debater Wendy Wilson said.
Along with memorizing statistics and facts, the debaters used more unorthodox methods to make their points.

“I’m wearing jeans because I had to pay for the dentist, rather than putting that money into the men’s fashion industry,” Wilson’s teammate Michael Belcher said.

The opposing side, Matt Gander and Hank Fields, urged the audience to reject health care as a human right “because it will destroy the economy and lead to extinction through super-viruses.” They also argued that universal health care would kill the profit motive for researching and developing new drugs.

The debaters talked in auctioneer-like, nonstop streams of argument, spouting rapid-fire statistics and rebuttals. They only broke for sharp intakes of breath, changes of topic and the buzz of the timer.

“Fifteen percent of the population doesn’t have coverage, 14,000 lose coverage every day and 44,800 people die of preventable diseases every year,” Wilson rattled off in less than five seconds.

However, Hailey Sheldon, one of the debate coaches, said the debaters were actually slowing down for the exhibition. She said a normal debate is “usually twice as fast.”

A panel of first-time student judges were on hand to decide the winner.

The judging panel was comprised of ASUO President Emma Kallaway, Vice President Getachew Kassa, ASUO Multicultural Advocate Diego Hernandez, Emerald Opinion Editor Robert D’Andrea and Co-director of University Students for Global Health
Michelle Leis.

Before the judges announced their decision, the audience was asked to move to the side of the room of the team it thought won the debate. The large majority sided with Gander and Fields, who argued against health care as a human right. Only six people sided with the other team.

The judges’ decision was closer, but it also went to Gander and Fields by a 3-2 vote.
Kallaway said the opportunity to judge gave her an eye-opening look at debate and a better understanding of some of her colleagues who are on the team.

“It made me understand a little more some of the amazing debaters we have in ASUO Senate,” she said.

cciaramella@dailyemerald.com 

Comments

1 comments
Richard Maloney
Wed Nov 4 2009 15:48
Dear Ducks:

As a former Quacker for Webfoots, this article is both heartwarming and appreciated.

In case you haven’t noticed it, our national discourse is in the gutter. Public meetings are disrupted by screaming rants. Talking heads such as Rush Limbaugh and Lars Larson spew words of hatred and divisiveness. Our popular culture discourages us from considering viewpoints which differ from those which we hold. Fear appeals are used to scare us from considering or accepting new ideas.

Debate provides an alternative which allows for strident, intense, and even competitive argument, while remaining respectful and respectable. When we hear two sides of an issue presented well by effective oral advocates, we get a very good idea of the merits and demerits of the respective positions.

I encourage everyone in the University of Oregon community to consider joining debate. You don’t need to participate at the level of last night’s participants. Hell, these are some of the finest college debaters in all the land. They are to college debate what Chip Kelly’s boys are to the world of college football. Simply ominous.

However, how many of you are going to want to be able to speak and make an effective point at a community meeting? Would it ever be useful to be able to explain to a judge the injustice of the traffic citation issued by the arresting officer? And when your smart-aleck kids talk smack to you, you are going to need to be at your very best in putting them down with your words, and not the back of your hand.

Personally, I want to thank those who are responsible for keeping debate vital and alive at the University of Oregon. Oregon is where “cross examination” style of debate originated. Its history at Oregon is a long and successful one. It is the part of my college experience which is by far the most memorable.

And, by the way, LET’S GO KICK STANFORD’S ASS.

Respectfully,
Richard Maloney,
Seattle, WA







log out